Missional Monday

A missional order is a community committed to the practices of a rule of life. The rule of life provides a framework for the rhythm of the community. The rhythm of life is both inward and outward, formation and mission.

There are several posts that I want to connect for this week’s Missional Monday, framed in thoughts from Dan’s post, Getting More Out of Communal Practice-ing. If this is of interest to you, please follow the links to read each of the posts in context.

Dan observes that more and more communities have adopted some form of practice-based rhythm to enhance their spirituality and missional formation and are experimenting with time-tested Benedictine rhythms or lower-bar versions of traditional communal practices.

He concludes:

In an age where the average Joe or Jane is so agenda-challenged, we probably need to settle for communal practice-ing arrangements that may well appear to be lower-bar versions of covenant community or missional Orders. But my guess is that discipleship is being enhanced nonetheless by such accessible rhythms of life. And these expressions may well be seeding the ground for the growth of deeper expressions of an Order-ed life on mission yet to be seen.

Examples of a Rule of Life for a Missional Order:

From Len:

Here is the statement we are working with as we look at initiating a missional order. MORPH means on a weekly basis we covenant to be:

Missional – I will engage in some noteworthy activity that engages and/or enriches my neighborhood or community or city (or world if traveling).

Other-centered – I choose to bless two people in some conscious act of goodness or generosity; at least one person outside my own church community.

Replenishing – I will join with my triad or quad in reading at least five chapters of a NT book, two chapters of an OT book, and at least one chapter of a spiritually-edifying book or article. I will learn to rest as an expression of God’s gift of Sabbath.

Prayerful – I will quiet my soul and spend one uninterrupted hour with God in prayer. I will also pray the Office at least one time per day and if possible meet to pray with someone or pray over the phone or Internet. I will seek to live prayerfully that I might partner with God in His work in and around me.

Poetic – I will seek simplicity and beauty in all that I do, understanding that God seeks to create in me the image of His son as a unique expression of His fathering. I will seek to love and rejoice in God’s world as He loves and joys in it.

Hospitable – I will extend or receive hospitality on two occasions (at least once with my church, and once with non-believing friends or with an individual in my home or neighborhood or in a Third Place).

We also agree to participate twice a month in our triad, holding one another accountable to this rule.

From Christine Sine:

Though everyone involved in MSA will never live in residential communities, we recognize that there is a need to foster a sense of shared spirituality and commitment in order to accomplish what God has called us to be and do.

As a result we want to encourage followers of Jesus to work towards:

1. A redeemed (restored) relationship to God through

a. Regular individual prayer

b. Scripture study

c. Times of listening in solitude (meditative prayer)

d. Regular corporate worship

2. A redeemed (restored) relationship to God’s community through

a. The practice of a common life with other followers of Christ

b. Service in the broader community

c. Hospitality and celebration

d. Solidarity with the marginalized

e. Economic stewardship that encourages mutual concern

3. A redeemed relationship with our own inner being through

a. Meditation and contemplation

b. Confession of sins

c. Spiritual formation

4. A redeemed relationship with God’s creation through

a. Responsible ecological stewardship

b. Connection to the God revealed through creation

Dan brings up the idea that perhaps questions would be more useful in developing and defining the practices of our Rule of Life:

Core questions reinforce the value of core practices
The concern I have is over how readily I see leaders deflecting the harder work of discernment away from groups by giving them ready-made practices. I’m beginning to wonder if what we really need are core questions, rather than simply core practices. With core questions, every participant and group is provoked toward the work of discernment, which in itself can be transformative. So, my vote at present is for practices backed up by core questions.

Examples of questions that could be adapted in the process of developing a Rule of Life:

From Makeesha, A New Kind of Question:

  • “how are you touching lives outside your faith community?”
  • “how are you doing as a community in showing people the tangible love of Jesus?”
  • “how often have you seen Jesus this week in the poor, marginalized, confused, hurting, sick, dying…?”
  • “is your community being hospitable, generous and kind to those in the community who do not attend your church?”
  • “how have you invested in your neighborhood recently?”

From Sky Jethani at Out of Ur:

  • How do we grow people?
  • How do we equip people and release them to serve outside the church/institution?
  • How do we inspire more people to go?
  • How many programs have other churches started that we can help support?
  • How many people have a committed relationship with another brother or sister in Christ?
  • How do we equip people to grow independent of the institution?
  • How much revenue can the institution give away?
  • How few buildings, pastors, and programs are necessary for God’s people to have time and energy to engage the community?

This core question from Peggy, the virtual abbess:

  • Is what I’m about to do/say (or not do/say) going to lead me to keep covenant or break covenant with God and others?
  • Whose best interest am I really looking out for at this moment?
Advertisements

7 thoughts on “Missional Monday

  1. I like the list from Len but really feel it needs to be quantified by the questions listed. I have been encouraging this where I serve. We just are finishing a 40 day experiment that touches on most of the list Len offered. The problem I have is getting people to join in learning and then if they do how to keep them working it after the study.
    WaynO

  2. I think many of the things Len speaks about are good but I am very wary of making a “covenant” or vow which includes specific numbers of times a certain thing will (or must) be done by someone. I think that when someone does not fulfill one of the stipulations, then guilt and shame and the accusation of the enemy will follow and worse case scenario, it will come through someone else in the community, especially if through a leader.
    The list from Christine Sine and the questions all the way to the bottom of the post are good. I think churches which are led by the Holy Spirit in love for God and neighbor, do (or try to do) those things. As more people in a given community understand and believe that God has a call on their lives and then begin to see God’s love for them in spite of their sin and brokenness, they can begin to actually do what is mentioned above.
    In other words, when the Holy Spirit begins his work in their lives, things happen.
    I think this is why healing prayer, deliverance, and mentoring are needed in the discipleship process.

  3. Inheritorofheaven, I hear you! I have chosen to use the word “covenant” only to refer to the New Covenant in Jesus Christ. It is powerful enough to hold us to the path of following The Way without adding stuff from “man” that leads to more burden.

  4. I have found this discussion very helpful. As we at MSA grapple with what a rule of life should be like we very much want to draw from the experiences and concerns of others. I love the idea of core questions. I strongly believe that one of our primary calls as Christian leaders is not to give people answers but to enable them to ask the right questions.
    Many blessings on all those that are grappling with these ideas.

  5. Thanks for sharing your thoughts everyone.

    inheritor,
    I still struggle with the language of covenant, vows, and rules for the reason you stated. I am not willing to be put under a false sense of religious obligation or performance.

    I believe we can have the freedom and leading of the holy spirit and also have a degree of intentionality, not as a law, but as an example of saying that these are the practices and disciplines that I find helpful in my spiritual formation.

    Practices should never replace relationship, only enhance it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s