Review: The Becoming of G-d

The Becoming of G-d

by Ian Mobsby

What the Trinitarian nature of God has to do with Church and a deep Spirituality for the Twenty First Century

It is difficult for me to say whether or not you would like this book.  It is dressed in the language of postmodern, emerging church, contextual theology. However, beneath that language lies a prophetic message of God’s desire for the church today. It was this message that engaged my imagination while reading this book.

The prominent underlying message of the book is trusting that the Spirit is beckoning the church toward a more accurate reflection of trinitarian relationship, regardless of the fact that this expression of church may be outside the realm of religious tradition and established models of church.

This understanding of the trinity, especially of the role of the Spirit, has been deficient in the church. The Spirit guides us toward more fully representing the triune nature of God. The church is challenged to model the indwelling, perichoretic nature of the trinity – unity, love, interdependence, creativity, intimacy, devotion – as communities of profound inclusion, love, and service.

You will enjoy this book if you are interested in reading about how emerging expressions of church make God accessible to people who are interested in spirituality but not religion.  Alt worship, contemplative prayer, and new monasticism are providing authentic spirituality that is able to connect with the spiritual hunger of our culture and provide genuine encounters with God.

If we believe that God’s love is already and always at work in the world seeking to restore all things to fullness of relationship, we can trust that the Spirit is at work bringing people to spiritual experiences, revealing the nature of God to those who are not yet Christian.

You will also appreciate this book if you are inspired by a robust pneumatology that more fully reflects the perichoretic nature of the trinity and the dynamic activity of the Spirit. It is through the Holy Spirit that we encounter and experience God, that we are enabled and empowered to become the church, and to re-imagine what it means to be the people of God in our culture today.

The Missional Threshold

From Brad Sargent’s What Is Missional? synchroblog entry:

The real question that some North American churches, ministries, and agencies are fighting over is WHO is “missional”? As if we are all Dogs Who Love the Lord and are trying to mark our territory.

There is something about the word missional that everyone wants to claim, as if to not be missional would be a disgrace.  “Well of course I’m missional!”

The reality is that most believers have not been trained in missional thinking or living.  Making that kind of change requires a process of inner transformation that will go much deeper than adopting the latest buzz word.

I have been trying to allow the Holy Spirit to teach me to live present to the people in my daily life and in the sphere of people I encounter. It continually requires changing the way that I view people and ministry. It is difficult moving very far beyond the circle that centers around our immediate needs.

I recently ran across something that I wrote about The Wall in the stages of faith…

This is the missional threshold – the point in our journey that determines whether we will remain consumers of religious goods and services or allow ourselves to be transformed into missional agents of God’s love and redemption to the world.

Sometimes, I still just want a program to sign up for, a service to attend
(like maybe an episcopalian service). It really isn’t about trying harder, but whether we will yield to that degree of inner transformation.

Election Day

Pick One

Neo-Orthodox II

The subject of the nature of the trinity is something that continues to interest me.  I believe that it is becoming more and more important in conversations about the nature of the church.  In fact, I would go so far as to say that it is something the Spirit of God is impressing upon the church today.

You can read my earlier thoughts in the original Neo-Orthodox post.

I was first introduced to the discussion of hierarchy in the trinity in this post by BWIII in which he presented Kevin Giles’ thoughts on The Eternal Subordination of Christ and Women.  Since then, I have read arguments on both sides of this issue.  Arguments for hierarchy are typically used to support patriarchy and/or authoritarian structures.

When BWIII reviewed Pagan Christianity and Re-Imagining Church, he argued for functional subordination.   I was actually surprised at this because it seemed a switch from his previous position.  In my opinion, functional subordination is a semantic game used to veil what is actually permanent subordination.

As I said in the original post, hierarchy within the trinity is actually the more unorthodox position.  It is really too bad that it has been re-introduced as doctrine in the church.

What difference does it make?

There are a lot of doctrinal issues where difference of opinion really does not matter.  However, I do not think that this is one of them (not that I expect the differences will be resolved).  The reason that I believe that this issue matters is because the church is to reflect the nature of relationship modeled in the trinity.  If our image of those relationships is skewed, our reflection becomes skewed.

One of the strengths of Frank Viola’s latest book, Reimagining Church, is the emphasis on trinitarian themes throughout the book.  It makes sense that this would influence so many aspects of being the church – community, leadership, mutuality, participation.  The nature of the trinity and our invitation to join in their relationship is fundamental to our identity as the people of God.

From The Becoming of G-d by Ian Mobsby:

“The Holy Trinity is beckoning the emerging Church to model a way of being a spiritual community that reflects the very nature of the Trinitarian Godhead.  The Holy Spirit is drawing those seeking missional and contemporary expressions of church for our postmodern consumerist context, to experiment with forms of church drawing on a perichoretic model.

I love the idea that this may be the Holy Spirit beckoning us on, transforming our imaginations, and helping us re-imagine another way of being.”

Both of these books have remarkably similar thoughts concerning the church being re-imagined in ways that reflect the nature of relationship and community in the trinity.  They also both heavily quote Stanley Grenz and Miroslav Volf.

In my opinion, both the emerging and missional movements reflect aspects of adapting the church to become a more accurate reflection of the image of God.

Will You Hold My Hand?

He lives with quiet strength and humble confidence

Never one to draw attention to himself

Always quick to see a need that he could meet.

~

Perhaps it began as the hero-worship of a child

I learned to trust his integrity as an immovable pillar

His wisdom as a sure and solid foundation.

~

As he ages, I come to terms with his humanity

Watch him struggle as frailty erodes his confidence

Pain and loss push us reluctantly to this point.

~

He lies broken in a hospital bed

I don’t need for him to be strong for me anymore

But I cannot bear to see his pain.

~

I look away, unable to face his pain

If only I could come to his rescue

To promise that everything will be all right.

~

But it isn’t true.

Sometimes.

It’s just not true.

~

If I could pound my fists against the skies

I would rail against the evil that crept in

and bit by bit stole his strength and his hope.

~

I don’t want to walk this path.

I can’t.

I’m too afraid.

~